Today is June 12, 2012, the 114th year of Philippine Independence from Spain. Yes, I say Spain because soon after this, the Americans took over, so technically we were not an independent nation until 1946. This day also reminds me of the treachery of Emilio Aguinaldo. How can I call this revolutionary leader, cited as the first Philippine president and who declared the Philippines independent in 1898, a treacherous person?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5181/a51811ac16796370e2cb8897c01defce74f44e83" alt=""
"Meanwhile Bonifacio met with his remaining supporters and drew up the Acta de Tejeros (Act of Tejeros) wherein they gave their reasons for not accepting the election results. Bonifacio alleged the election was fraudulent due to cheating and accused Aguinaldo of treason due to his negotiations with the Spanish. In their memoirs Santiago Álvarez (son of Mariano) and Gregoria de Jesús both alleged that many ballots were already filled out before being distributed, and Guillermo Masangkay contended there were more ballots prepared than voters present. Álvarez writes that Bonifacio had been warned of the rigged ballots before the votes were canvassed, but he had done nothing." (retrieved from wikipedia)
Aguinaldo sent a delegation to Bonifacio to get (bully, most likely) him to cooperate but he refused. Soon after, Aguinaldo's government ordered the arrest of Bonifacio. After being charged with sedition and treason against Aguinaldo's government and conspiracy to murder Aguinaldo, Bonifacio and his brother Procopio were sentenced to death after a one-day sham trial. Is it not a sham when the entire jury was composed of Aguinaldo's men and Bonifacio was denied the privilege of confronting the state witness who the prosecutors claim had been killed in battle, but
after the trial the witness was seen alive with them? Aguinaldo claims that he wanted to commute the execution order to exile, but his generals convinced him otherwise. What baloney!
My mother met Emilio Aguinaldo in the late 40's when she was in high school during a field trip to
Cavite and being young asked him outright, "Sir, what happened to Andres
Bonifacio?" Aguinaldo told her that "the answer will come out when
I die." Well, Aguinaldo has been dead for 48 years and still that question has never been answered. There are a lot of conjectures, speculations, research, analysis but no honest answer.
Personally, I believe that politics killed Andres Bonifacio just as politics today continue to eliminate anyone who is considered or perceived as a threat to the powerful and the powers that be. Emilio Aguinaldo may have fought hard for the independence of the Philippines but his ambition for power also made him a treacherous man. It was not only Bonifacio that he sent to death because his men also assassinated General Antonio Luna in 1899. I also believe that Aguinaldo has heavily paid for his transgressions. The power and honor he sought has eluded him to his death. The Americans whom he trusted made a fool out of him. The Filipino people did not elect him into office (he was never elected by the people) when he overwhelmingly lost to a Spanish mestizo, Manuel L. Quezon during the 1935 Commonwealth Presidential elections. And worst, was when he was arrested briefly after World War II for collaborating with the Japanese. There is one good thing though that happened for the fighting men of the revolution. They were never forgotten by Aguinaldo. For them, he established the Veterans Organization which provided them pensions and land to own.
I told my mom just as I was finishing writing this, that the better question she should have asked General Aguinaldo was "if you had the chance to change history, what would you do?" Maybe then she would have gotten an answer.